Titlebook: Giving Reasons; A Linguistic-Pragmat Lilian Bermejo Luque Book 2011 Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011 Argumentation.Argumentation T

MOAT

苦笑

MERIT

Why Do We Need a New Theory of Argumentation?,avoid instrumentalism in proposing a normative model for argumentation is to characterize argumentation goodness in terms of justification. Then, in Section 2.5, I explain that adopting such non-instrumentalist view is, in addition, the only way to overcome the . that normative models for argumentat

Critical

deriver

GLOSS

The Dialectical Dimension of Argumentation,ical normative conditions of argumentation are constitutive respecting its justificatory dimension – or, in other words, that for a piece of communication to be considered argumentation, it has to fulfill certain dialectical conditions. In turn, such dialectical conditions happen to be regulative re

enmesh

The Rhetorical Dimension of Argumentation,h strategy for incorporating a rhetorical perspective within our normative models. According to it, every piece of argumentation has to be analyzed and, more importantly, appraised from a rhetorical perspective..The idea of including rhetorical conditions for determining the value of a piece of argu

單調(diào)女

機(jī)制

ADAGE

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-54163-6avoid instrumentalism in proposing a normative model for argumentation is to characterize argumentation goodness in terms of justification. Then, in Section 2.5, I explain that adopting such non-instrumentalist view is, in addition, the only way to overcome the . that normative models for argumentat