Titlebook: Getting to Good; Research Integrity i Arthur L. Caplan,Barbara K. Redman Book 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer N

Expiration

handle

Kurt Bauknecht,Carl August Zehnders endeavor include genomic science, health outcomes research, developmental psychology, and neuroimaging studies, which generate and utilize large amounts of data housed on both public and private sites. Challenges in current efforts to build a more comprehensive data infrastructure include data sto

entrance

Doppelintegrale und Kurvenintegrale,l developing and policies are variable. (Subjects protection regulations for many countries may be found on the US Office of Human Research Protection website). Policies and research ethics frameworks are not yet harmonized, and varied intellectual property and trade laws may limit data transfer.

芳香一點

ABYSS

Longitude

,Human Subjects’ Protection,rt, which described ethical principles for human research, regulations known as the Common Rule (common across federal agencies) followed. They may be found at 45 CFR 46 and are administered by the Office of Human Research Protections (OHRP). Updated regulations have been approved and are expected t

字的誤用

Responsible Authorship,y and integrity of the conduct of research and the resulting publications. Authorship credit can be highly contested with few guidelines or sources for the adjudication of disputes. Still, even without a single algorithm to determine authorship, addressing authorship and authorship priority at the b

強(qiáng)行引入

Plagiarism,plagiarism is done with an intent to deceive. The aim is the acquisition of scientific credit, publication credit, and ultimately to garner prestige and promotion. Self-plagiarism, the reuse of ideas and text from one’s own previous work, if referenced, is usually not a problem, especially if

outrage

無法治愈

Whistleblowing,n science. While allegations can be filed in any regulatory area (research misconduct, human or animal subjects protection, conflict of interest), most attention has been paid to their role in identifying research misconduct (FFP) since other methods of detection such as routine nonfinancial audits,