Titlebook: Germany‘s Civilian Power Diplomacy; NATO Expansion and t Chaya Arora Book 2006 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Nature America Inc. 2006 d

Malicious

書目名稱Germany‘s Civilian Power Diplomacy影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Germany‘s Civilian Power Diplomacy影響因子(影響力)學科排名




書目名稱Germany‘s Civilian Power Diplomacy網(wǎng)絡公開度




書目名稱Germany‘s Civilian Power Diplomacy網(wǎng)絡公開度學科排名




書目名稱Germany‘s Civilian Power Diplomacy被引頻次




書目名稱Germany‘s Civilian Power Diplomacy被引頻次學科排名




書目名稱Germany‘s Civilian Power Diplomacy年度引用




書目名稱Germany‘s Civilian Power Diplomacy年度引用學科排名




書目名稱Germany‘s Civilian Power Diplomacy讀者反饋




書目名稱Germany‘s Civilian Power Diplomacy讀者反饋學科排名

MOTIF

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-07156-4time also its greatest weakness because—as constructivists contend —it blinds its adherents to the constitutive and regulative forces of the ideational realm in international affairs. In the constructivist view, it is possible to study ideas and beliefs in terms of the properties of agents while at

Tempor

Chauvinistic

The Question of Germany’s Normalizing Ambitionsilateral foreign policy approach to be sustained in light of the growing complexity of the dynamics of regional and international change? In other words, to what extent might Germany’s multilateral foreign policy approach be subject to a redefinition of the “parameters of the possible” in light of g

Gum-Disease

慢慢沖刷

慢慢沖刷

并入

CRUMB

The Smyser-Habermasian “Navigational Aid”U.S.-led study on Germany’s negotiating behavior, it is hoped that a “navigational aid” can be developed with which the empirical analysis of Germany’s influence on the U.S. decision to enlarge NATO can then proceed.

EVEN

Keeping the Process Afloat, 1995Central Europeans, there were growing concerns that the prospects for NATO membership were growing dimmer given that NATO had agreed to “freeze” the discussion on enlargement until after the December 1995 Russian parliamentary elections and the country’s June 1996 presidential elections.