Titlebook: Gerda Walther’s Phenomenology of Sociality, Psychology, and Religion; Antonio Calcagno Book 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018 Ego a

GLOAT

書目名稱Gerda Walther’s Phenomenology of Sociality, Psychology, and Religion影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Gerda Walther’s Phenomenology of Sociality, Psychology, and Religion影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Gerda Walther’s Phenomenology of Sociality, Psychology, and Religion網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Gerda Walther’s Phenomenology of Sociality, Psychology, and Religion網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Gerda Walther’s Phenomenology of Sociality, Psychology, and Religion被引頻次




書目名稱Gerda Walther’s Phenomenology of Sociality, Psychology, and Religion被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Gerda Walther’s Phenomenology of Sociality, Psychology, and Religion年度引用




書目名稱Gerda Walther’s Phenomenology of Sociality, Psychology, and Religion年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Gerda Walther’s Phenomenology of Sociality, Psychology, and Religion讀者反饋




書目名稱Gerda Walther’s Phenomenology of Sociality, Psychology, and Religion讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

把…比做

Grasping

Erfolgsfaktoren im internationalen Handelly divergent topics are held together through her use of Edmund Husserl’s phenomenological method. Tracing the flow of lived experience back to its point of origin, Walther distinguishes different “spheres” constitutive of the fundamental human essence (namely, the vital-bodily, the feelings of the

Tartar

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-8349-9978-8e of or on behalf of a community. Interestingly, Walther’s understanding of that notion is patently at odds with the idea of a social act originally propounded by Reinach. According to Reinach, an act is social if it “addresses” other persons and if it, for its success, requires them to grasp it. We

土坯

Zusammenfassung und Implikationen, can grow and be formed as human beings. Although they share a phenomenological framework, they describe community in different ways. Stein starts from I-experience to reach her understanding community, which is analyzed deeply and in all its constitutive elements, whereas Walther moves from the soc

認(rèn)識

認(rèn)識

,Leits?tze zum Kooperationserfolg,reate a social community and why do they strive for connection with other human beings? To answer these questions, I start with the basic assumption that Walther understands human beings as social beings and I explain her concept of the human being. I demonstrate that the constitution of the human b

crutch

ROOF

聯(lián)想記憶