Titlebook: George Eliot for the Twenty-First Century; Literature, Philosop K. M. Newton Book 2018 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2018

懇求

書目名稱George Eliot for the Twenty-First Century影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱George Eliot for the Twenty-First Century影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱George Eliot for the Twenty-First Century網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱George Eliot for the Twenty-First Century網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱George Eliot for the Twenty-First Century被引頻次




書目名稱George Eliot for the Twenty-First Century被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱George Eliot for the Twenty-First Century年度引用




書目名稱George Eliot for the Twenty-First Century年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱George Eliot for the Twenty-First Century讀者反饋




書目名稱George Eliot for the Twenty-First Century讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

expdient

NIP

Chromatic

violate

Eliot as Psychological Novelist,thin Victorian conventions. Henry James, however, misses the point when he claims that Eliot neglects the opportunity for a properly psychological approach by refusing to restrict her focus to one dominating consciousness. Though still able to explore individual psychology in depth, in her later nov

Progesterone

Progesterone

and the Novel of the Future, cosmopolitanism. It also implies that British imperial power is likely to be under threat since there are hints that Germany and America will be the major powers of the future. It breaks new ground in the structure of its narrative, its treatment of psychology and temporality being complex and inno

我邪惡

Eliot and the Politics of Modernism,ogress and had no conception how this would be shattered by the Great War. But she became more bleak about the future following the ‘Barbarism’ of the Franco-Prussian War. Though there are superficial links with the radical right-wing politics of certain modernists, being sceptical about aspects of

Fillet,Filet

尖牙