Titlebook: Georg Simmel and Contemporary Sociology; Michael Kaern,Bernard S. Phillips,Robert S. Cohen Book 1990 Kluwer Academic Publishers 1990 Georg

Cession

書目名稱Georg Simmel and Contemporary Sociology影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Georg Simmel and Contemporary Sociology影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Georg Simmel and Contemporary Sociology網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Georg Simmel and Contemporary Sociology網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Georg Simmel and Contemporary Sociology被引頻次




書目名稱Georg Simmel and Contemporary Sociology被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Georg Simmel and Contemporary Sociology年度引用




書目名稱Georg Simmel and Contemporary Sociology年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Georg Simmel and Contemporary Sociology讀者反饋




書目名稱Georg Simmel and Contemporary Sociology讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

pulmonary

,On The Current Rediscovery of Georg Simmel’s Sociology — A European Point of View,ogy deserves this recognition and distinction. The valuation of Simmel however is of recent date, especially in Germany, his native country. If we take a look at the history of Simmel studies in Germany and abroad and consider the impact of his works outside Germany, we find some remarkable differen

表狀態(tài)

,Georg Simmel’s Concept of Society,satisfactory answer it was often claimed the discipline could not exist: namely, the concept of society. Simmel is one of the first sociologists who sought to secure grounds for the new discipline of sociology without having recourse to the then — and often subsequently — seemingly unproblematical a

HATCH

Georg Simmel and the Study of Modernity,gins of that which is “new” in modern society, then why might we wish to single out the endeavours and contribution of Georg Simmel in delineating the study of modernity? If we turn to classical social theorists and sociologists, then we do indeed find important attempts to investigate modernity. Ma

完成才能戰(zhàn)勝

裝勇敢地做

裝勇敢地做

,Simmel’s Contribution to Parsons’ Action Theory and its Fate,ies with Parsons himself. In contrast to the manner in which he established his relationship to other European intellectual figures, Parsons never explicitly identified the role Simmel played in his own intellectual development or the development of his theoretical system (cf. Parsons 1959, 1970, [1

cauda-equina

Simmel on Memory,odernity may suggest a sociological approach to memory. Not only does Simmel’s work provide a framework that gives legitimacy to a sociological study of the inner life of individuals in modern society (and so of their personal memory, too), but, through his stress on the contrast between subjective

reperfusion

,Social Differentiation and Modernity: On Simmel’s Macrosociology, comparison with other classical contributions the significance of his work continues to be underestimated. For example, in several recent reinterpretations of classical theory Simmel is barely mentioned at all (Alexander 1981—4; Habermas 1981). Much earlier, Parsons had left Simmel out of . after h

倫理學(xué)