Titlebook: Geopolitics Reframed; Security and Identit Merje Kuus Book 2007 Merje Kuus 2007 Europe.international relations.NATO.european union politics

MARS

coltish

填料

entitle

Cultural Geopolitics and Cultured Geopoliticians,ey role of intellectuals in the geopolitical scripting of Central Europe. Bauman stresses the role of cultural and intellectual capital in Central European politics, and . illustrates the effectiveness of that capital in putting Central Europe onto Western mental maps.

MEEK

Book 2007mines assumptions that shaped these debates and influenced policy-making, combining fresh theoretical approaches from international relations and political geography with rich empirical material from Central Europe. This book provides the first in-depth analysis of security discourse in the region.

Fibroid

Geopolitics Reframed978-0-230-60549-7Series ISSN 2945-6770 Series E-ISSN 2945-6789

和藹

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-93843-5 of the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation (NATO).. The alliance invited seven new members: Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Slovakia, Romania, Bulgaria, and Slovenia. It was a spectacular affair, involving not only the official summit meeting but also a range of supporting events organized by nongovernm

MOT

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-96905-7 last the long-standing division of Europe between West and East and reunite the continent as a cultural whole. In the new member states, Europe is a rhetorical pillar of foreign and security policy. The “we” in whose name these policies are conducted is not just the nation; it is also Europe. These

Pessary

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-8348-9331-4alm is the driving force of their foreign and security policies. This desire is widely considered a more powerful impetus “than mere economic or political motivation could ever be.”. Indeed, European, Western, or civilizational values are cited across the region as the self-evident and primary bases

少量

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-92821-4 the region, a key argument for membership in the EU and NATO was that such membership would provide the accession states with security guarantees and thereby protect their sovereignty. A key argument against EU membership—NATO was left out of that one— was that it would reduce the security of the C