Titlebook: Geoffrey of Monmouth and the Feminist Origins of the Arthurian Legend; Fiona Tolhurst Book 2012 Fiona Tolhurst 2012 feminism.history.novel

獨(dú)裁者

書(shū)目名稱Geoffrey of Monmouth and the Feminist Origins of the Arthurian Legend影響因子(影響力)




書(shū)目名稱Geoffrey of Monmouth and the Feminist Origins of the Arthurian Legend影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱Geoffrey of Monmouth and the Feminist Origins of the Arthurian Legend網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度




書(shū)目名稱Geoffrey of Monmouth and the Feminist Origins of the Arthurian Legend網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱Geoffrey of Monmouth and the Feminist Origins of the Arthurian Legend被引頻次




書(shū)目名稱Geoffrey of Monmouth and the Feminist Origins of the Arthurian Legend被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱Geoffrey of Monmouth and the Feminist Origins of the Arthurian Legend年度引用




書(shū)目名稱Geoffrey of Monmouth and the Feminist Origins of the Arthurian Legend年度引用學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱Geoffrey of Monmouth and the Feminist Origins of the Arthurian Legend讀者反饋




書(shū)目名稱Geoffrey of Monmouth and the Feminist Origins of the Arthurian Legend讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

Myocyte

Awning

Complicating and Undermining Feminist Legend in ,,d Uther’s daughter Anna as a pivotal figure in British history, Queen Ganhumara as King Arturus’s partner in power, Helena as heroic in her resistance to sexual violation, and her nursemaid as heroic in her self-sacrifice. Nevertheless, Geoffrey’s narrative of the British past contains gaps that his

啜泣

Hiatal-Hernia

,Geoffrey of Monmouth’s , as Feminist Text,or the Arthurian legend because in it female figures are valued, share political power with males, receive sympathetic treatment from Geoffrey as narrator, and offer models of heroism that complement—and sometimes surpass—the models their male counterparts embody. This argument gains additional vali

迫擊炮

迫擊炮

BABY

輕快來(lái)事

意見(jiàn)一致

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-37890-8e that likely has some roots in early medieval history but one that most scholars treat as legendary. . The nature of Geoffrey’s twelfth-century contribution to the Arthurian tradition, however, receives far less scholarly attention than the contributions of authors such as the . poet and Sir Thomas