Titlebook: Genocide and its Threat to Contemporary International Order; Adrian Gallagher Book 2013 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publis

解毒藥

書目名稱Genocide and its Threat to Contemporary International Order影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Genocide and its Threat to Contemporary International Order影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Genocide and its Threat to Contemporary International Order網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Genocide and its Threat to Contemporary International Order網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Genocide and its Threat to Contemporary International Order被引頻次




書目名稱Genocide and its Threat to Contemporary International Order被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Genocide and its Threat to Contemporary International Order年度引用




書目名稱Genocide and its Threat to Contemporary International Order年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Genocide and its Threat to Contemporary International Order讀者反饋




書目名稱Genocide and its Threat to Contemporary International Order讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

jumble

Isabella Hajduk,Annika Nordberg,Eeva Rainioest in the same way that crimes such as nuclear proliferation, piracy, and drug trafficking do. It is here that this chapter challenges such mainstream thinking as it claims that in failing to prevent genocide states increase the likelihood of international instability in international relations.

Tartar

很是迷惑

Book 2013ds a direct relationship with the central concepts of international relations: the state, war, power, and security. This bold, innovative and unique book sets out to tackle this by bringing the concept of genocide into the discipline of IR, via the English School, in order to theorise the relationsh

Lament

混合,攙雜

混合,攙雜

diathermy

Design Thinking: Process or Culture? answering this controversial question, scholars have tended to espouse universal moral principles when advocating compassion and humanitarian intervention. Genocide, it is claimed, constitutes a crime against humanity. The problem is that such understanding tends to be built on the assumption that

demote

Design Thinking for New Business Contexts Dunne and Daniela Kroslak’s claim, ‘The consensus supporting the Genocide Convention masks important disputes around issues of intent, scale, and identity of victim-group.’. In other words, IR scholars should not simply rely on the Genocide Convention in order to gain an understanding of what const

吹牛者