Titlebook: Genocide and Human Rights; A Philosophical Guid John K. Roth Book 2005 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 2005

楓樹

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-43839-8et and Oxford anthropologist whose critique of philosophy was developed against the background of the Holocaust. The epigraph from Imre Kertész’s novel goes to the heart of Steiner’s philosophical investigation of philosophy, which emphasizes that, far from being irrational, evil is impregnated by a

消息靈通

Coterminous

字的誤用

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77225-7ing, but those magisterial figures in the tradition of Western thought unwittingly contributed to the formation of a culture of genocide. They did so by proposing philosophies of history that were designed to give meaning to humanity as a species, while nevertheless embracing an idea of progress fro

陶醉

G. Nicolescu,I. O’Connor,C. Piguetentury, he suggested, will be the century of its enforcement. Among the political and judicial advocates who fight for the development of international law, many are driven by a passion to ensure that respect for national sovereignty should not prevent the prosecution of political and military leade

遍及

錢財

John Gero,Mary Lou Maher,Weiguang Zhangamong them. Nevertheless, it is important, perhaps surprising, to note that it is only in recent history, namely since the Enlightenment, that genocide has had the status of a manifestly self-evident moral wrong. That result is closely connected to the fact that human equality, as we understand it,

neurologist

The Materiality of Design Thinking,tal assaults. On the other hand, if one lacks the stomach for deceit in such situations, it is simply a matter of good taste to rehearse the customary denunciations and regrets, referencing either the regrettable aspects of human nature, the inhuman nature of the perpetrators, and/or the incomprehen

chisel

Book 2005hilosophy. Strangely, however, philosophers have tended to ignore genocide. Even more problematic, philosophy and philosophers bear more responsibility for genocide than they have usually admitted. In Genocide and Human Rights: A Philosophical Guide, an international group of twenty-five contemporar

褪色

Jennifer Jenson,Suzanne de Castelloutside of the field who has a great respect for philosophy, my colleague simply assumed that an event as devastating as the Holocaust must have had a profound effect on moral philosophy. Wouldn’t all ethicists, he assumed, feel the need to respond to the murder of millions and the calculated attempt to extinguish European Jewry in its entirety?