Titlebook: Genital Cutting: Protecting Children from Medical, Cultural, and Religious Infringements; George C. Denniston,Frederick M. Hodges,Marilyn

effrontery

,Schlu?folgerungen und Ausblick,utine male infant circumcision. Their extended family referred them to me for counseling and to support their efforts at restoring their relationship. The couple’s motivation to collaborate during assessment and openness to the contemporary option of foreskin restoration as part of their self-manage

思想

Der verzagte Staat — Policy-Analysen come under scrutiny in recent years by philosophers, ethicists, and medical professionals. This chapter draws from my recent book, . (Reis .) and argues that, historically, doctors have performed surgeries on infants and children for non-medical reasons. In the case of intersex, surgery was perform

冒號(hào)

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-92169-8or prevention of likely serious illness, the decision whether and how to operate can be deferred until the child is old enough to express an informed view about the options and in a forum that addresses conflicts of interest. That age depends on the intervention and risks. The decision is not a simp

hypnotic

Yag-Capsulotomy

水獺

吞吞吐吐

樸素

用不完

動(dòng)物

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-91622-9, Jews, and Muslims, circumcision is an unquestioned rite of passage, be it secular or religious. For secular Americans, it is an assumed medical “improvement.” For religious Jews and Muslims, it is a sacred mark of belonging, and for secular Jews, the tribal connection is often paramount. For non-c