Titlebook: Genetics and Genomics of Pineapple; Ray Ming Book 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018 Pineapple.Domestication.Genomics.Sequencing.Imp

比目魚(yú)

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-41238-1diversity suggests a secondary center where sexual recombination mostly involved domesticated forms. According to archaeological and linguistic data, the edible pineapple has been cultivated for more than 3000?years in Amazonia and coastal Peru, and 2500?years in Mesoamerica, implying a very early d

incredulity

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-29174-0pineapple propagation in agriculture. The pineapple plant has evolved to CAM photosynthetic pathway, which ensures its great adaptation to dry and high-temperature environment. At night, the pineapple stomata open to absorb the carbon dioxide and fix the carbon dioxide within the plant as the form o

帶來(lái)的感覺(jué)

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-663-20337-7divergence between . and . and the genetic differentiation among the botanical varieties of . were explored by using biochemical and molecular marker techniques. DNA-based molecular markers, such as RAPD, RFLP, AFLP, SSR, and SNP, have been widely utilized in the detection and the evaluation of gene

一條卷發(fā)

ostracize

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-87654-6ted for 44% of the assembly. The 27.4% unassembled sequences are all highly repetitive centromere, telomere, and rDNA clusters (2.4%) and TEs (25%), indicating that TEs accounted for 69% of the pineapple genome. LTR retrotransposons were the most abundant of TEs, representing 33% of the assembly. In

Little

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-50867-7strategies. The most optimal accuracy and contiguity were achieved in the de novo assembly of error-corrected long reads using Celera. The MD-2 pineapple genome achieved a N50 of 153,084?bp with 8448 scaffolds and a total assembly size of 524.07 Mb. In addition, 245 out of the 248 ultra-conserved CE

hegemony

Walther Wegener,Burkhard Wulfhorstneapple against several related monocot, eudicot, and basal angiosperm genomes providing a solid framework to study the patterns of macroscale genome evolution, in order to clarify the nature and dating of recurring genome duplication events. On the local scale, we have identified significant sequen

flamboyant

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-663-06780-1ssion levels. In addition, TEs of different families show expression bias in various tissues. The . family was most highly expressed in flower and floral tissues. The massive expansion of several TE families affects the genome size rapidly. ., a family of the . superfamily, constitute of 60% of LTR

Gossamer

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-39626-1ow that miRNAs also trigger the generations of secondary phased siRNAs (phasiRNAs), from either noncoding genes or coding genes, called as PHAS loci. Our analysis identified 45 PHAS loci encoding 21?nt phasiRNAs and 73 PHAS loci encoding 24?nt phasiRNAs in pineapple. We also predicted the putative t

tenosynovitis

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-85285-4of differentially expressed genes, assembled transcripts, along with the identified AS isoforms and events, provides a solid foundation for further examination of the gene functions in pineapple metabolism, growth, development, and fruit ripening. The data are available at Plant Alternative Splicing