Titlebook: General History of the Caribbean UNESCO Volume 6; Methodology and Hist B. W. Higman (formerly Professor of History) Book 2003 Palgrave Macm

COLIC

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6091-752-3 in Caribbean scholarship; after all, people were brought here to work. As it turns out, that hope is not misplaced, though it would appear that it is forms of organization of labour, in particular slave, contract and peasant endeavour, which have been the major focus of attention. Similarly, it wou

LINES

我不明白

沉著

fleeting

Q. C. Kessel,E. Pollack,W. W. Smithhistory in Puerto Rico), an assessment of the principal works published up to that time in the field. In 1969 Isabel Gutiérrez del Arroyo reviewed Puerto Rican historiography from the Melgarejo Chronicle of 1582 to the . (Historical bulletin) of 1914–27. In 1975 Alberto Cibes Viadé examined the work

inspiration

值得贊賞

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-1779-1o examine the context in which history-writing has been produced, more particularly the factors which have shaped the selection and treatment of themes and informed interpretation. Distinct phases in history-writing on Jamaica are identified for the purpose of analysing the shifting interpretations,

Obstacle

https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137297242described as the first phase of British colonial expansion.1 They were at various stages the scene of European rivalry in the West Indies but, by the time of the sugar revolution, the Leeward Islands, in particular, were important sugar colonies. One finds, however, that for a long time, the islands

酷熱

Barter

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-73776-5Caribbean; historiography; history