Titlebook: Gender in Philosophy and Law; Laura Palazzani Book 2013 The Author(s) 2013 Core Gender Identity.D. Haraway: Cyborgs.Dialectic Of The Sexes

Coarctation

書目名稱Gender in Philosophy and Law影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Gender in Philosophy and Law影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Gender in Philosophy and Law網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Gender in Philosophy and Law網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Gender in Philosophy and Law被引頻次




書目名稱Gender in Philosophy and Law被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Gender in Philosophy and Law年度引用




書目名稱Gender in Philosophy and Law年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Gender in Philosophy and Law讀者反饋




書目名稱Gender in Philosophy and Law讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

擋泥板

From Gender to Queer,dergoes a further profound transformation of meaning in the context of the postmodern deconstructionist perspective. This line of thought radicalises the premises of social constructionism: it interprets the outcome of social construction as a structure produced and organised by power, which should

lambaste

Gender: From Theory to Law,ly the explicit reference to ‘sex’, in the general meaning of sexual identity, as an unjustified reason for discrimination, along with natural, ethnic, socio-economic conditions and political and religious opinions. In this context there emerges a general reference to ‘other status’ without further

萬神殿

生來

nitric-oxide

nitric-oxide

From Gender to Queer,order to allow free expression to the multiple, fragmented, contingent individual’s will or desire. It is in this context that the category of gender gives way to the queer theory. There are two elements that connote in an innovative way ‘queerness’ or ‘queering’: polymorphism and pansexualism, that deny sexual binarism and heterosexism.

coalition

2192-855X conceptual clarification of a complex debate, enabling the rThis book is an introductory systematic framework in the complex and interdisciplinary sex/gender debate, focusing on philosophy of law.The volume analyses the different theories that have dealt with the gender category, highlighting the co

傲慢人

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4842-7774-4 the dangers of an in-different or neutral law, the contradictions and ambiguities that arise behind the appeals to equality and non-discrimination as ‘equivalence’, in order to comprehend and justify the sense of justice (as treating equals equally and the unequal unequally) and the fundamental human rights of the person before the gender claims.

使迷醉