Titlebook: Gender and the Political Opportunities of Democratization in South Korea; Nicola Anne Jones Book 2006 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Na

削木頭

書(shū)目名稱Gender and the Political Opportunities of Democratization in South Korea影響因子(影響力)




書(shū)目名稱Gender and the Political Opportunities of Democratization in South Korea影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱Gender and the Political Opportunities of Democratization in South Korea網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度




書(shū)目名稱Gender and the Political Opportunities of Democratization in South Korea網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱Gender and the Political Opportunities of Democratization in South Korea被引頻次




書(shū)目名稱Gender and the Political Opportunities of Democratization in South Korea被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱Gender and the Political Opportunities of Democratization in South Korea年度引用




書(shū)目名稱Gender and the Political Opportunities of Democratization in South Korea年度引用學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱Gender and the Political Opportunities of Democratization in South Korea讀者反饋




書(shū)目名稱Gender and the Political Opportunities of Democratization in South Korea讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

peptic-ulcer

決定性

,The Korean Women’s Movement: From , Feminism to Gender Mainstreaming,ely negative impact of neoliberal economic reforms on women’s status, the renewed strength of cultural conservative groups, and divisive party politics (e.g., Jaquette and Wolchik, 1998; Siemienska, 1998; Vargas, 2002), such concerns have been largely absent in Korea. Although the reform process has

哥哥噴涌而出

周興旺

,The Political Institutional Matrix—Identifying Access and Veto Opportunities,, analysts of the gender dynamics of democracy have tended to focus on problems of “institutional inertia” (Craske, 1999), “the return to politics as usual” (Jaquette and Wolchik, 1998), or even “masculinist politics” (Moon, 2003). Although such approaches make a valuable contribution to the democra

責(zé)怪

責(zé)怪

noxious

,Women’s Political Representation: Accounting for Gradualism,ocratization literature has been a rethinking of how democracy is practiced—do elected officials fairly reflect the composition of society in terms of gender, class, and ethnicity? Have concepts of “the political” been broadened to incorporate everyday life and community politics? (e.g., Alvarez et

Arthropathy

Pigeon

,The Political Institutional Matrix—Identifying Access and Veto Opportunities,tic consolidation literature by (re)constructing citizenship as a fundamentally gendered process, they too often fail to unpack the state and provide a disaggregated analysis of the concrete problems that historically specific institutions represent.