Titlebook: Gender and Change in Archaeology; European Studies on Nona Palinca?,Ana Cristina Martins Book 2024 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The A

閃光東本

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-7768-7known. It is normally assumed that pottery production was an activity exclusively performed by men since they were, in fact, the main owners of the workshops. Nevertheless, women’s names tend to appear in many historical documents as potters, especially when their deceased husbands left them the bus

和平主義

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-80686-7 Danube (.. 1350–800?BC). It takes as a starting point studies of the preceding period (.. 1600/1550–1350?BC), which argue that the latter was characterized not only by a strongly patriarchal regime and a rigorous separation between the various kinds of work of men and women, but also by liberal wom

Fillet,Filet

GIBE

投票

Ingratiate

Breast Asymmetries: A Working Formulationlogy and the sociology of archaeology, both globally and in different national contexts. The historical and sociological approach to this theme is essentially based on the binary sexual distribution between male and female archaeologists. This does not exclude the necessary and unavoidable attention

貪心

Madhur Gupta MD,Neeru Goyal PhDaken over the last 30?years, paving the way, often amid adverse circumstances, for the current endeavour. We thus begin by providing an initial overview of the subject, covering the situation up until 2017, the year the seminar that gives rise to this collective book was held. This is followed by a

Indicative

Luca Mazzarella,Pier Giuseppe Peliccithe special equality budget for research centres funded by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG). This paper will present the funding possibilities for archaeological projects in Germany with a focus on the link between support criteria, on the one hand, and equality measures and gender research

LAY

Calibrate

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96947-3hes in the epistemological transformation of the discipline has been very significant. The commitment of the practitioners of feminist and gender archaeology to standpoint theory has been paramount in the construction of a ‘strong objectivity’ stance within the discipline, but there are reasons to b