Titlebook: Gender and Cancer in England, 1860-1948; Ornella Moscucci Book 2016 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2016 Britain.England.E

學(xué)術(shù)討論會(huì)

The Yellow Principle: Develop a Will to Win,ss campaigns which target women’s cancers. One of the results has been that lung cancer, the most common cause of cancer death in both men and women, is conspicuously absent from the literature addressed specifically at women or men. Moscucci concludes that a more critical approach is needed. A gend

visual-cortex

眉毛

使習(xí)慣于

捐助

https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230514300peutic failure. ‘The Making of a “Hopeful” Cancer’ concludes with analysis of the professional controversy over Wertheim’s hysterectomy and the part it played as a catalyst for the first cancer awareness campaign of the twentieth century.

Cpap155

W. K. Melville,M. R. Loewen,Eric Lamarred to the development of staging systems for cervical cancer, in an effort to provide common definitions of primary cervical carcinoma. The chapter concludes with a discussion of the establishment of radiotherapy as a medical specialism and the impact this had on the treatment of cervical cancer after the Second World War.

Matrimony

S. Bellucci,S. Krivonos,A. Sutulincal cancer. Lack of enthusiasm for screening in Britain can also explain why the ‘wet film’ technique, a cytological method of intra-operative diagnosis introduced by pathologist Leonard Dudgeon in the late 1920s, failed to develop into a screening method, despite showing great promise as a means of detecting early cervical and lung cancer.

遺傳學(xué)

,Cancer: A ‘Female’ Disease,s origins. In the late 1800s official statistics began to show that the disease was rising at a much faster rate in men than in women, fanning fears that the incidence of cancer was increasing. Yet anxieties about rising trends of cancer mortality in men did not substantially challenge the view that cancer was a ‘female’ disease.

尾隨

,The Making of a ‘Hopeful’ Cancer,peutic failure. ‘The Making of a “Hopeful” Cancer’ concludes with analysis of the professional controversy over Wertheim’s hysterectomy and the part it played as a catalyst for the first cancer awareness campaign of the twentieth century.

Adulterate