Titlebook: Gaming the Dynamics of Online Harassment; Kevin Veale Book 2020 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license t

calcification

書(shū)目名稱Gaming the Dynamics of Online Harassment影響因子(影響力)




書(shū)目名稱Gaming the Dynamics of Online Harassment影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱Gaming the Dynamics of Online Harassment網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度




書(shū)目名稱Gaming the Dynamics of Online Harassment網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱Gaming the Dynamics of Online Harassment被引頻次




書(shū)目名稱Gaming the Dynamics of Online Harassment被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱Gaming the Dynamics of Online Harassment年度引用




書(shū)目名稱Gaming the Dynamics of Online Harassment年度引用學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱Gaming the Dynamics of Online Harassment讀者反饋




書(shū)目名稱Gaming the Dynamics of Online Harassment讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

為敵

Networked Publics of Abuse,plores boyd’s idea and its critical context in detail, and explains its relevance to studies of understanding online harassment. Not only are networked publics a foundational concept for understanding online communication, but they can help illuminate how the fundamental designs of online spaces are

多山

無(wú)辜

Gaming the Rules,o manipulate them as part of ‘playing the game.’ These dynamics highlight the extent to which purely technological solutions are doomed to failure because they will simply represent new systems to ‘game’ or miss social dimensions to the problem. An example is the ‘Google bomb,’ where a harassment ca

固執(zhí)點(diǎn)好

Mnemonics

Reshaping the Landscape, reality games. The key is to provide people with as much flexible control over their own engagement with a space as is possible, since harassment campaigns depend on removing agency or finding places where the design of the networked public removes it for them. This chapter argues that alternatives

Mnemonics

outskirts

Vertebra

,Kleine Sün den (Pornographia cerebralis),rlap in their structure and community dynamics. This includes how they set their goals, their relationship with external challenges, how people are introduced to the community, and their approach to problem-solving. Approaching harassment communities as malevolent ARGs helps explain a number of distinctive dynamics visible in online harassment.

四溢

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-17882-6ve, or become weaponised for harassment themselves. This chapter discusses the possibility that social media platforms have a profit motive for being unmotivated to fix abuse being delivered through their platforms, and also unpacks the ways that they currently directly profit from abuse.