Titlebook: Games: Unifying Logic, Language, and Philosophy; Ondrej Majer,Ahti-Veikko Pietarinen,Tero Tulenheim Book 2009 Springer Science+Business Me

BOOST

Neutral-Spine

Why Play Logical Games? the lack of a convincing philosophical account of logical games, what it means to play them, for the proponent to win, etc., pointedly raised by Wilfrid Hodges as the ‘Dawkins question’. In this paper, I critically examine two available answers: after a brief discussion of an argument by Tennant ag

novelty

On The Narrow Epistemology of Game-Theoretic Agentsanations shows that they do not conform to the belief-desire framework of action explanation. Epistemic characterization theorems (specifying sufficient conditions for game-theoretic solution concepts to obtain) are argued to be the canonical way to make game theory conform to that framework. The be

Jingoism

Fallacies as Cognitive Virtuesric mission. In so doing, it has taken on in a quite general way a game-theoretic character, precisely as it was with the theory of syllogistic refutation in the . and ., where Aristotle develops winning strategies for disputations. The approach that the present authors take toward the logic of prac

熱心助人

A Strategic Perspective on if Gamesimperfect information. In this paper we set up a strategic framework for the evaluation of IF logic à la Hintikka and Sandu. We show that the traditional semantic interpretation of IF logic can be characterized in terms of Nash equilibria. We note that moving to the strategic framework we get rid of

奇思怪想

Towards Evaluation Games for Fuzzy Logicszation of the evaluation games for classical logic. It is shown that it provides an interesting contribution to the model theory of fuzzy logics as, unlike the standard semantics, it can deal with the so-called non-safe models. The second kind of semantics makes explicit the intuition about fuzzy lo

LOPE

Games, Quantification and Discourse Structure deal of attention has been paid to truth conditions, the contributions of quantifiers to the discourse have been little studied. This paper seeks to rectify this by developing a set of game rules that account both for the truth conditional and the discourse contributions of quantified expressions.