Titlebook: Games to Play and Games not to Play; Strategic Decisions Uri Weiss,Joseph Agassi Book 2023 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s)

和音

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-58784-9a game to play: possibly all players will stay with a particular game even though they will all benefit from moving from that game to another possible game.People may adhere to the equilibrium of war even when they have an option of peace: they may avoid peace negotiations out of ignorance of the need to change both the game and the strategy.

貿(mào)易

The Game Not Chosen,a game to play: possibly all players will stay with a particular game even though they will all benefit from moving from that game to another possible game.People may adhere to the equilibrium of war even when they have an option of peace: they may avoid peace negotiations out of ignorance of the need to change both the game and the strategy.

armistice

Book 2023ame theory recommends diverse strategies (plans of actions) for various given games, particularly those in Nash equilibria, in which no player benefits from one-sided strategy alteration. The literature also refers to the design of games that fit given goals. This is the mechanism design theory; its

不妥協(xié)

火光在搖曳

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-49463-9ave practical results.2 We argue that when the norm is to respect agreements, agreements improve cooperation even in one-time stag hunt game. It goes well with the proposal to consider game theory part-and-parcel of social science: how does playing in a given game depend on the culture within which it takes place.

disparage

Verwendung als Entscheidungsmodell, game played by the European Union, we contend, is nearer to the stag hunt game than to the prisoner’s dilemma game. Every European Union country recently (rightly, of course) recognizes peace as best—and thus as better than an attack on a defenceless neighbour that would lead to an immediate victory.

Amendment

開玩笑

HATCH

藕床生厭倦