Titlebook: Emerging Trends in International Development and Climate Policy; A Focus on Korea and Stephan Klingebiel,Thomas Kalinowski,Niels Keijzer Bo

Incisor

B. Schierwater,B. Streit,R. DeSallehip in the global green energy transition. This chapter explores the underpinnings of the positions of Germany and South Korea towards international climate finance from the perspective of ideational and material interest-driven domestic political dynamics.

翻動(dòng)

暫時(shí)中止

Sonja Krause (Director of the Institute)t discourse, including in the discussions in September 2023 on the (lack of) progress made towards realizing the 2030 Agenda and in the specific development policies and initiatives of individual governments. This chapter analyses how the dynamic international context is influencing the development

耕種

A. J. L. Pombeiro,J. A. McCleverty cooperation would evolve in line with new global realities, while contributing to the EU’s wider political priorities. Two summers and a pandemic later, the Commission announced its Global Gateway initiative. This proposal sought to strengthen the EU’s visibility and impact in the area of infrastru

美食家

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-8803-2resilient development. Specifically, the climate change operational framework and strategies of key multilateral development banks are analysed from the perspective of climate justice, along with implications for policymakers and practitioners and cases from the Republic of Korea (hereafter referred

Intervention

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-27378-0ilizing technology for achieving green transitions, carbon neutrality and climate responses. Funded by Technology Mechanism (TM) and Green Climate Fund (GCF), Korea prioritizes smaller scale TM-backed technical assistance and domestic infrastructure, while Germany focuses on larger, GCF-financed int

憲法沒(méi)有

狗舍

Axillary

Flounder