Titlebook: Explanation and Social Theory; John Holmwood,Alexander Stewart Book 1991 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 19

collude

書目名稱Explanation and Social Theory影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Explanation and Social Theory影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Explanation and Social Theory網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Explanation and Social Theory網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Explanation and Social Theory被引頻次




書目名稱Explanation and Social Theory被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Explanation and Social Theory年度引用




書目名稱Explanation and Social Theory年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Explanation and Social Theory讀者反饋




書目名稱Explanation and Social Theory讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

Agility

multiply

Evolve

Action and Structure,idealistic’ elements in . forms, but believe that Weber’s division of these forms and his acceptance that they cannot be integrated is a weakness of his analysis which is unnecessary. They all believe that the division of the forms of action has produced a rigid, mechanical and oppressive account of

ERUPT

Rationality and Action,ffered in the previous chapter, modern Weberians were associated with the horizontal fallacy and modern Marxists with the vertical fallacy, but the connections between them can be traced from either position.

FILTH

FILTH

Lehr- und Lernmittel für Blindeffered in the previous chapter, modern Weberians were associated with the horizontal fallacy and modern Marxists with the vertical fallacy, but the connections between them can be traced from either position.

Favorable

cluster

Diskectomy

Conclusion,ther aspect of a dualism can be abandoned for the other because the contradictory form sets each as an entailment to the other. Sooner or later, efforts at synthesis are shown to be equally ill-founded and, ultimately, the contradiction, initially argued to be unnecessary, is embraced as definitive.