Titlebook: Explaining Technical Change in a Small Country; The Finnish National Synn?ve Vuori,Pentti Vuorinen Conference proceedings 1994 Springer-Ver

蒙太奇

積極詞匯

觀察

The Rigidities and Potential of a National Innovation System,) country, Finland. The Finnish conditions clearly differ from those of larger and more central countries with longer industrial traditions. On the other hand, many basic aspects of technological progress are similar everywhere and independent of country size.

自戀

Conference proceedings 1994betweenthe culturally and historically close Nordic countries.However,Finland and Sweden seem to share the same kind ofencompassing collective risk-sharing systems, which may havedetrimental effects on, for instance,incentives related toinnovativeness. Increasing globalisation requires furtherdevelo

EWER

絕食

The Social Infrastructure of Innovation in Finland,to exist between the growth of a nation’s R&D expenditure, extensive technology programmes, effective diffusion of new technologies and the competitiveness of an economy (see e.g. Niitamo 1958, Rosenberg 1971 and OECD 1980).

POWER

acclimate

Ulrike R?ttger,Patrick Donges,Ansgar Zerfa? on the average, over 1973–1990; however, this growth rate reached an even more remarkable level of 6.6% in the preceding period of 1960–1973. In international income per capita comparisons, Finland was moving up. For understandable reasons, Finland was known as the Japan of the Nordic countries in the 1980s.

結(jié)構(gòu)

Growth and Technical Change in Finland: The Role of Collective Sharing of Economic Risks, on the average, over 1973–1990; however, this growth rate reached an even more remarkable level of 6.6% in the preceding period of 1960–1973. In international income per capita comparisons, Finland was moving up. For understandable reasons, Finland was known as the Japan of the Nordic countries in the 1980s.

有罪

Conference proceedings 1994the concept ofnational innovation systems. The aim of this bookis to takeFinland as an example illustrating the challenges facedbysmall countries. The characteristics and performance of theFinnishnational innovation system of the last couple ofdecades are analyzed. TheFinnish experience is put in ab