Titlebook: Explaining Games; The Epistemic Progra Boudewijn de Bruin Book 2010 Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010 Epistemic logic.Games.Knowled

夾子

書目名稱Explaining Games影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Explaining Games影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Explaining Games網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Explaining Games網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Explaining Games被引頻次




書目名稱Explaining Games被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Explaining Games年度引用




書目名稱Explaining Games年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Explaining Games讀者反饋




書目名稱Explaining Games讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

white-matter

GLIB

Applications of Game Theory–Fudenberg procedure is not necessarily the only consequence of common true belief about payoff-uncertainty, and that both Aumann’s and Reny’s analyses of backward induction make conceptually inconsistent assumptions.

干旱

0166-6991 ging field of philosophy of game theory.Gives a fascinating,Does game theory - the mathematical theory of strategic interaction - provide genuine explanations of human behaviour? Can game theory be used in economic consultancy or other normative contexts? Explaining Games: The Epistemic Programme in

Harness

Policy-Transfer und Policy-Diffusionnot common true belief about rationality leads to backward induction. Robert Aumann defends a position in favour of this implication, Philip Reny objects, and both positions are taken by various other theorists.

cloture

Burkhard Niederhoff,Roland Weidleted to a view of scientific methodology that declares economic theory, if true at all, only true ‘in the abstract’. In that view, game theory does not so much study strategic interaction of economic agents reasoning on the basis of beliefs, desires and rationality principles, as relate it to a field of vaguely adumbrated ‘truths-in-the-abstract’.

cloture

Juvenile

警告

Tincture