Titlebook: Explaining Beauty in Mathematics: An Aesthetic Theory of Mathematics; Ulianov Montano Book 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerl

隱士

Christoph Schwindt,Tobias Paetzofs is the main subject of analysis; this further serves to highlight some limitations of the idea of the aesthetic induction. We conclude that an account of beauty based merely on the passive contemplation of properties of objects is insufficient to account for mathematical items that involve the a

宇宙你

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-83484-5atory anomalies. In particular, historical evidence supports the existence of historical constants—properties whose preferences remain relatively unchanged throughout history, fact which contradicts the aesthetic induction.

chuckle

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-04628-5sted by Theo Kuipers’ approach to the aesthetic induction. Kuipers interprets the aesthetic induction in terms of the mere exposure effect. The idea of using empirical findings to address beauty in science is quite appealing, thus, it is utilized, along with the evidence discussed in . and a rudimen

缺乏

豐富

Nagesh Bhat,Usha Yadav,Rajesh K. Chaurasiareactions. By interpreting aesthetic evaluation as consisting on concurrent affective and propositional evaluations it is possible to model the evolution of aesthetic value as governed by a mechanism of constrained aesthetic induction.

食料

刻苦讀書

calorie

燈泡