Titlebook: Expert Modernists, Matricide and Modern Culture; Woolf, Forster, Joyc Lois Cucullu Book 2004 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Pu

可樂

書目名稱Expert Modernists, Matricide and Modern Culture影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Expert Modernists, Matricide and Modern Culture影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Expert Modernists, Matricide and Modern Culture網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Expert Modernists, Matricide and Modern Culture網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Expert Modernists, Matricide and Modern Culture被引頻次




書目名稱Expert Modernists, Matricide and Modern Culture被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Expert Modernists, Matricide and Modern Culture年度引用




書目名稱Expert Modernists, Matricide and Modern Culture年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Expert Modernists, Matricide and Modern Culture讀者反饋




書目名稱Expert Modernists, Matricide and Modern Culture讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

allergen

,Queer Couplings: Forster’s Hellenic Pastoralism and Modern Masculinity,cupation of Forster’s modernism (Trilling 118). How Forster attempted to answer this dilemma has long been overshadowed by critical commentary that has assigned the novelist to the periphery of modernism and the arts, of metropolitan and masculine culture, even of Bloomsbury. His contemporaries and

開始發(fā)作

Putting Rouge on the Corpse: Cosmopolitan Joyce and Modern Culture,l biography of Joyce and so has Joyce scholarship responded. Expressed in the present progressive, Ellmann’s declaration has continued to summon exegetes so that more than one monograph has staked its interpretive heft on the biographer’s avowal, to such an extent, in fact, that what once appeared a

Seizure

Afterword, aesthetic practice represented a dynamic process that was part and parcel of the accession of the expert class and the proliferation of secular knowledge. Through their critique of domestic jurisdiction, the institution of the middle-class home, and the biological and social reproductions these ove

樂器演奏者

說明

說明

,Die effektive Kapitalerh?hung,cupation of Forster’s modernism (Trilling 118). How Forster attempted to answer this dilemma has long been overshadowed by critical commentary that has assigned the novelist to the periphery of modernism and the arts, of metropolitan and masculine culture, even of Bloomsbury. His contemporaries and

永久

l biography of Joyce and so has Joyce scholarship responded. Expressed in the present progressive, Ellmann’s declaration has continued to summon exegetes so that more than one monograph has staked its interpretive heft on the biographer’s avowal, to such an extent, in fact, that what once appeared a

Adjourn

aesthetic practice represented a dynamic process that was part and parcel of the accession of the expert class and the proliferation of secular knowledge. Through their critique of domestic jurisdiction, the institution of the middle-class home, and the biological and social reproductions these ove

irreducible