Titlebook: Expert Judgment and Expert Systems; Jeryl L. Mumpower (Associate Professor),Ortwin Ren Conference proceedings 1987 Springer-Verlag Berlin

bile648

anaphylaxis

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-92801-7hold in 25 years and which of these services will be supplied by state and industry. We ask social science experts to predict the effects of such techniques and services. While most expect a growth in these techniques and services, they disagree about their effects on social contacts, creativity amo

discord

Bogdan Murgescu,Andrei Florin Soraovide this help are quite distinct from each other. Indeed, both decision analysis and expert systems have complementary strengths. Consequently, each has significant advantages that could be usefully adapted by the other. This article focuses on how decision analysis could appropriately be used to

Modify

飛來飛去真休

Das Sozialamt und die ?neue Armut“ these. Since Ontario Hydro’s route and site selection process involves large numbers of internal and external experts from a variety of backgrounds, and has evolved into a regular process employing a variety of approaches or methods, it would seem to form a valid basis for one opinion on these issu

存在主義

SLAG

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-90296-8dualized instruction, modeled after the idea of a private tutor, allows a student to proceed at his own pace, to explore his interests, and to receive personal, detailed evaluation and direction (Clancey, 1986). Computerassisted-instruction (CAI) may facilitate such individualized instruction in a m

Heretical

持久

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20574-8sions, on the one hand, and prescriptive theories on the other hand. Prescriptive theories are formal procedures which one supposedly ought to apply to determine the best decision under some well defined conditions. Such conditions are usually specified by a relatively small number of facts or varia

襲擊