Titlebook: Existential Inertia and Classical Theistic Proofs; Joseph C. Schmid,Daniel J. Linford Book 2023 Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2023 logic

Exposition

Existential Inertia: Thesis and Taxonomy,to taxonomize inertial theses. This includes questions about scope, relativity theory, modal register, dependence and destruction, and metaphysical accounts of inertial persistence. We then articulate our existential inertia thesis using our answers to these taxonomic questions. Finally, in hopes of

無(wú)法取消

The Metaphysics of Existential Inertia,hings persist at all. The purpose of this chapter is to redress this lack of research. More specifically, we develop and categorize explanations of persistence on which temporal things (or some subset thereof) persist without external sustenance or conservation unless and until they are positively d

貧窮地活

MAUVE

Mind the Gap,imelessness, perfection, uniqueness, goodness, omnipotence, intelligence, omniscience, freedom, and immateriality. We also argue that the failure of the Aristotelian proof’s second stage entails the failure of the second stages of the other classical theistic proofs we consider in our book. Moreover

neoplasm

cushion

破布

The Thomistic and Rationalist Proofs, something in which essence and existence are identical. The Rationalist proof reasons from the reality of contingent beings to the existence of a purely actual, necessary being. Drawing on the resources of previous chapters, we argue that both proofs fail.

不溶解

壓迫

Book 2023ofs. Finally, they defend new arguments against. .classical theism based on abstract objects and changing divine knowledge. The text appeals to students, researchers, and others interested in classical theistic proofs, the existence and nature of God, and the ultimate explanations of persistence, change, and contingency..

STERN

In Memoriam Prof. Werner Seubertlar importance is the Doctrine of Divine Simplicity (DDS) and its understanding of parthood. After explaining both DDS and its attendant conception of parthood in detail, we explain the notions of intrinsicality and extrinsicality and explore the dialectical context of classical theistic proofs.