Titlebook: Executive Power in Theory and Practice; Hugh Liebert (Assistant professor of American poli Book 2012 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Nat

mortality

書(shū)目名稱Executive Power in Theory and Practice影響因子(影響力)




書(shū)目名稱Executive Power in Theory and Practice影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱Executive Power in Theory and Practice網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度




書(shū)目名稱Executive Power in Theory and Practice網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱Executive Power in Theory and Practice被引頻次




書(shū)目名稱Executive Power in Theory and Practice被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱Executive Power in Theory and Practice年度引用




書(shū)目名稱Executive Power in Theory and Practice年度引用學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱Executive Power in Theory and Practice讀者反饋




書(shū)目名稱Executive Power in Theory and Practice讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

感激小女

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-55586-7d J. G. A. Pocock restored our appreciation of the American founders’ avid classicism. Today, a spate of neo-Schlesingerians herald the “return of the imperial presidency,” while myriad books, articles, and even museum exhibits ask, more plaintively than proudly—.. Lurking behind this question is th

沙發(fā)

discord

Palgrave Studies in Crime, Media and Culturensternation or delight, depending on their disposition—illustrate what has long been a truism for debaters: It is far easier to demolish an opponent’s theory than to develop a plausible alternative. It is one thing to divest a king of his sovereignty; it is quite another to know what to do with that

MIR

調(diào)整校對(duì)

https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137356918 a short essay to examine the informal constraints on presidential action and to suggest that these raise legitimate worries about the future of republican government in the United States. Both the White House bureaucracy and the presidency’s public relations apparatus threaten the president’s abili

調(diào)整校對(duì)

多嘴

法律

Understanding the Things of State: On Machiavelli’s Use of Modo, Ordine, and Via” for “orders,” and for their relation? What are these new modes and orders? How do they differ from the old ones? And what is their significance for Machiavelli’s political thought? The following study tries to answer some of these questions with a kind of executive summary of how Machiavelli uses

軟弱