Titlebook: Evolutionary Biology; Volume 22 Max K. Hecht,Bruce Wallace,Ghillean T. Prance Book 1988 Plenum Press, New York 1988 Wallace.biogeography.ev

萌芽的心

書(shū)目名稱Evolutionary Biology影響因子(影響力)




書(shū)目名稱Evolutionary Biology影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱Evolutionary Biology網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度




書(shū)目名稱Evolutionary Biology網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱Evolutionary Biology被引頻次




書(shū)目名稱Evolutionary Biology被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱Evolutionary Biology年度引用




書(shū)目名稱Evolutionary Biology年度引用學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱Evolutionary Biology讀者反饋




書(shū)目名稱Evolutionary Biology讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

linguistics

Aposematism and Batesian Mimicry,nd when they rest during the day on the bark of a tree (Kettlewell, 1955, 1956). A disruptive pattern (e.g., the white bands on the wings of “admiral” butterflies) may contribute to camouflage by breaking up the animal’s outline (Cott, 1957).

Tinea-Capitis

Book 1988taries on evolution, in the broadest sense of that term. The topics of the reviews range from anthropology, molecular evolution, and paleobiology to principles of systematics. In recent volumes, a broad spectrum of articles have appeared on such subjects as asymmetric sexual isolation, biochemical s

違反

Horses, the Fossil Record, and Evolution,bly turns to that inexhaustible textbook example, the horse sequence. This has been cited—incorrectly more often than not—as evidence for practically every evolutionary principle that has ever been coined.” This cautionary note notwithstanding, fossil horses do indeed provide compelling evidence in support of evolutionary theory.

hypotension

and commentaries on evolution, in the broadest sense of that term. The topics of the reviews range from anthropology, molecular evolution, and paleobiology to principles of systematics. In recent volumes, a broad spectrum of articles have appeared on such subjects as asymmetric sexual isolation, bio

搖晃

搖晃

MIRE

grieve

t everyone ofthe many facets of biological evolution is covered. Manuscripts should be sent to anyone of the following: Max K. Hecht, Department of Biology, Queens College of the City University of New York, Flushing, New York 11367; Bruce Wallace, Department of Biology, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and Sta978-1-4612-8251-8978-1-4613-0931-4

EXULT

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-59042-0whether they are called “sister groups,” “ancestors,” “stem taxa,” “missing links,” or whatever) are inherently greater in fossil biotas than in Recent ones (. the taxic paucity of “l(fā)iving fossils,” such as monotremes, coelacanths, cladistians [polypterids], agnathans, etc., versus the relative abun