Titlebook: Evolutionary Biology; Volume 16 Max K. Hecht,Bruce Wallace,Ghillean T. Prance Book 1983 Plenum Press, New York 1983 Charles Darwin.Darwin.W

慢跑鞋

Phenotypic Evolution in Microfossils,elds of animal husbandry and plant breeding. A recent volume along the same lines as Falconer’s is the book by Bulmer (1980). This deals with the more mathematical aspects of quantitative genetics and complements, but in no way surpasses, the work of Falconer.

我不明白

Biochemical and Immunological Systematics of the Order Crocodilia,ack of critical fossils, have made paleontological interpretations extremely difficult (Sill, 1968; Hecht and Malone, 1972; Langston, 1973; Buffetaut, 1979). Because of such problems and the small number of living species, morphoclines are rare, further complicating the efforts of the comparative morphologist (Hecht and Malone, 1972).

整體

Morose

羽飾

The Interpretation of Evolution. The creative force in evolution undoubtedly is not mutation pressure, but selection. To support this statement, the store of genetic variation in natural populations had to be characterized, and it had to be shown that steady selection pressure could slowly and gradually alter characters by accumulating small additive effects of many genes.

enmesh

The Evolution of Enzyme Catalytic Efficiency and Adaptive Inference from Steady-State Kinetic Data,erests have merged in the study of the function and evolution of both interspecific and intraspecific enzyme variants and the possible roles the observed structural and functional variation might play in adaptation.

增長(zhǎng)

Fracture

CLEAR

CRUC

The Role of Single-Gene Mutations in the Evolution of Flowering Plants,tude mutations [in the extreme case, Goldschmidt’s (1940) “hopeful monsters”] and have been filtered by natural selection (Eldredge and Gould, 1972; Gould, 1977). The history and details of these concepts are discussed by Mayr (1982).