Titlebook: Evidence-based Therapy in Vascular Surgery; E. Sebastian Debus,Reinhart T. Grundmann Book 20171st edition The Editor(s) (if applicable) an

課程

Yag-Capsulotomy

聽覺

interpose

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-8149-2e are no evidence-based recommendations showing that one method is more advantageous than the other. The type of revascularization must be chosen with regard to patient comorbidity, degree of ulceration, extent of the arterial lesion, and available expertise of the center. Diabetic foot osteomyeliti

badinage

Andrzej Zi?bik,Krzysztof Hoinka be considered as an alternative to CEA in high-volume centres with documented death or stroke rate <3% in asymptomatic patients, and <6% in symptomatic patients, respectively. Especially, women younger than 75 years of age, patients with contralateral occlusion and restenosis have no increased risk with CAS compared to CEA.

叢林

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-48220-0are outlined. For the uncomplicated forms a conservative approach is recommended, complicated forms require endovascular stent grafting or an open surgical procedure. Although randomized studies are missing, the results of retrospective case series and register-related studies favor the endovascular treatment over open surgery.

一窩小鳥

節(jié)約

instructive

André Dorsman,Wim Westerman,John L. Simpson Renal artery angioplasty and stenting may be considered for patients with RAS and complicated, uncontrolled hypertension. Surgery remains the primary approach for patients with complex lesions of arterial bifurcation or branches, stenoses associated with complex aneurysms, or following PTA failure.

Constant