Titlebook: Events and Grammar; Susan Rothstein Book 1998 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1998 grammar.language.Proposition.semantic.semanti

ACRO

書目名稱Events and Grammar影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Events and Grammar影響因子(影響力)學科排名




書目名稱Events and Grammar網(wǎng)絡公開度




書目名稱Events and Grammar網(wǎng)絡公開度學科排名




書目名稱Events and Grammar被引頻次




書目名稱Events and Grammar被引頻次學科排名




書目名稱Events and Grammar年度引用




書目名稱Events and Grammar年度引用學科排名




書目名稱Events and Grammar讀者反饋




書目名稱Events and Grammar讀者反饋學科排名

隱藏

Transformatoren (T) (Umspanner),tic theory is one filled with varying conceptions of what these are, if indeed they exist at all.. They have at times been conceived of as purely syntactic objects (e.g. the ‘theta roles’ of Chomsky, 1981; the “case relations” of Fillmore, 1968), as names for parts of lexical/conceptual structure (e

LAITY

有說服力

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-7863-8account goes some way towards explaining the discourse properties of progressive sentences, and has been adopted by a number of authors, including Moens (1987), Parsons (1990), and Kamp and Reyle (1993). Others, including Smith (1991), have argued against treating the progressive as a stativizer. I

myalgia

,-Messung in kleinen Flüssigkeitsmengen,ollowing Doron’s (1983) terminology), and discuss the implications of this claim for a number of topics dealt with in current theories of genericity. I begin with a background about the distribution of Pron, and make the initial claim about the connection between Pron and genericity. In section 3 an

Ondines-curse

Ondines-curse

Dislocation

Celiac-Plexus

,Elektrische Wellen in der Ionosph?re,The fact that we make reference to events in our language is a well established linguistic fact. Nominals have long been recognised as elements which can refer to events. Vendler (1967) discusses the meanings of derived nominals such as the subject in (1), and shows that it is ambiguous.

Frequency

,Die ersten drahtlosen übertragungsversuche,The behavior of tenses in future contexts is quite peculiar. When a present tense is under the scope of a future auxiliary (.), the temporal location for events constrained by that tense is shifted forward. Although . in (1) has present tense, the anticipated meeting events follow the utterance time.