Titlebook: Evaluation of Clinical Biofeedback; William J. Ray,James M. Raczynski,William H. Kimba Book 1979 Plenum Press, New York 1979 Biofeedback.T

COWER

lymphoma

Asthma,sorder may persist throughout the individual’s life (Feldman, 1976; Khan, 1977). While the exact physiological etiology of asthma is not known, it is apparent that asthma involves a hypersensitivity to allergens as well as emotional factors. Asthma is associated with an obstruction of the bronchiole

Encoding

calamity

Sexual Disorders,opriate sexual response in males. These studies utilized a penile plethysmographic technique in which a strain gauge was affixed around the penis. Changes in penile circumference were then monitored on recording equipment and used to provide feedback to clients regarding the degree of their sexual a

確保

Biofeedback and Psychotherapy, to psychoanalytically-oriented psychotherapy. The biofeedback procedures used in these case studies are drastically different from the procedures described in other sections of this review, and it has been recently noted that there seems to be little actual biofeedback training involved (Blanchard

擔(dān)憂

achlorhydria

Hyperactive and Learning-Disabled Children,eractivity is characterized by a short attention span and inappropriately high activity levels. Learning disabilities occur as a result of disturbances in cognition, perception, or motor functions. A learning-disabled child’s school performance, particularly in reading, is markedly discrepant from h

變色龍

Dental Disorders,for dental problems was published by William Solberg and John Rugh in 1972. This unique collaboration of a dentist and a behaviorally oriented psychologist generated a new line of research and clinical application. Reprinted articles on the behavioral treatment of dental dysfunctions along with othe

Archipelago

裁決

Summary and Conclusions,tion from scientists on whose research the therapy is based. The case with biofeedback is no different. This creates a difficult situation for the individual interested in evaluating the efficacy of clinical biofeedback techniques. Since the field is relatively new, these techniques have neither sto