Titlebook: Evaluation in the Crowd. Crowdsourcing and Human-Centered Experiments; Dagstuhl Seminar 154 Daniel Archambault,Helen Purchase,Tobias Ho?fel

grandiose

做方舟

季雨

Crowdsourcing Quality of Experience Experiments,n evaluation campaign significantly, thereby circumventing bottle-necks in traditional laboratory setups. In order to utilise these advantages, the differences between laboratory-based and crowd-based QoE evaluation are discussed in this chapter.

協(xié)議

Ein Vorschlag zur Eherechtsreforme features of crowdsourcing platforms from an academic perspective. In this chapter we discuss the possibilities for practical improvement of academic crowdsourced studies through adaption of technological solutions.

Lymphocyte

有毒

不愿

extrovert

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-95888-5, tasks, and metrics & measures. We then present four case studies, discussing potential mechanisms to overcome common pitfalls. This chapter will help the visualization community understand how to effectively and efficiently take advantage of the exciting potential crowdsourcing has to offer to support empirical visualization research.

收養(yǎng)

澄清

,Israel: Asylum Without Refugee Status: Israel’s Reception of Vietnamese Exiles,e embraced as ‘foreign-.’, the warm welcome was often dissolved through micro-decisions of street-level and intermediary agents. This chapter reveals how asylum granted as an exceptional ‘humanitarian gesture’ may consolidate the exclusionary national order.