找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開(kāi)始

掃一掃,訪問(wèn)微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Evaluating Systems for Multilingual and Multimodal Information Access; 9th Workshop of the Carol Peters,Thomas Deselaers,Vivien Petras Con

[復(fù)制鏈接]
樓主: odometer
11#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 12:05:38 | 只看該作者
Evaluating Word Sense Disambiguation Tools for Information Retrieval Taskrder to apply an state-of-art WSD tool? In addition, we have evaluated several approaches in order to apply WSD. We have used several types of indices. Thus, we have generated 13 indices and we have carried out 39 different experiments, obtaining that some indices based on WSD tools even outperforms
12#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 14:40:04 | 只看該作者
IXA at CLEF 2008 Robust-WSD Task: Using Word Sense Disambiguation for (Cross Lingual) Information Re. We tried several query and document expansion and translation strategies, with and without the use of the word sense disambiguation results provided by the organizers. All expansions and translations were done using the English and Spanish wordnets as provided by the organizers and no other resour
13#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 18:27:22 | 只看該作者
SENSE: SEmantic N-levels Search Engine at CLEF2008 Ad Hoc Robust-WSD Trackn Forum (CLEF) 2008. The evaluation was performed using SENSE (SEmantic N-levels Search Engine), a semantic search engine that tries to overcome the limitations of the ranked keyword approach by introducing ., which integrate (and not simply replace) the lexical level represented by keywords..We sho
14#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 23:23:25 | 只看該作者
IR-n in the CLEF Robust WSD Task 2008ueries. Furthermore, we have experimented with two well known relevance feedback methods - LCA and PRF -, in order to figure out which is more suitable to take profit of the WSD query expansion based on Wordnet. Our best run has obtained a 4th - 0.4008 MAP -. A major finding is that LCA fits better
15#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 06:21:14 | 只看該作者
16#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 08:34:47 | 只看該作者
Analysis of Word Sense Disambiguation-Based Information Retrievald. We try, through this paper, to give a deep analysis of the reasons behind these failures. During our participation at the Robust WSD task at CLEF 2008, we performed experiments on monolingual (English) and bilingual (Spanish to English) collections. Our official results and a deep analysis are de
17#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 14:25:45 | 只看該作者
18#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 18:08:46 | 只看該作者
0302-9743 seven main eval- tion tracks in CLEF 2008 plus two pilot tasks. The aim, as usual, was to test the p- formance of a wide range of multilingual information access (MLIA) systems or s- tem components. This year, 100 groups, mainly but not only from academia, parti- pated in the campaign. Most of the g
19#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 21:56:56 | 只看該作者
20#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 01:30:37 | 只看該作者
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛(ài)論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點(diǎn)評(píng) 投稿經(jīng)驗(yàn)總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機(jī)版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國(guó)際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-5 15:07
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
珲春市| 金门县| 仙游县| 滕州市| 安西县| 咸丰县| 仙居县| 抚远县| 天峨县| 绥德县| 唐河县| 贵溪市| 宁德市| 磐石市| 昌吉市| 连平县| 温州市| 车险| 新和县| 泸西县| 黔西县| 沐川县| 襄樊市| 鄂托克前旗| 益阳市| 临安市| 五家渠市| 沅江市| 丽江市| 自贡市| 罗田县| 罗山县| 周宁县| 吴堡县| 长丰县| 封开县| 南和县| 登封市| 财经| 清流县| 扶沟县|