找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開(kāi)始

掃一掃,訪問(wèn)微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Evaluating New Technologies; Methodological Probl Paul Sollie,Marcus Düwell Book 2009 Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009 Ethical Tec

[復(fù)制鏈接]
樓主: 我贊成
31#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 21:00:25 | 只看該作者
32#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 05:03:38 | 只看該作者
The Moral Relevance of Technological Artifactsnt, and it analyzes the ethical dimensions of technology itself. First, the chapter addresses the question of how to conceptualize and assess the moral significance of technological artifacts. If technologies help to shape moral actions and decisions, how to understand and evaluate this moral role o
33#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 05:53:52 | 只看該作者
Interdisciplinarity, Applied Ethics and Social Scienceicists working together, but also by an increasing attention, from both sides, to the very nature of their cooperation. The debate on this topic has been ongoing for more than twenty years, but in the last years the discussion became more intense. However, one can doubt whether up until now the rele
34#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 09:36:40 | 只看該作者
35#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 17:25:09 | 只看該作者
36#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 21:48:14 | 只看該作者
On Uncertainty in Ethics and Technologyinty is a pivotal feature of complex technologies, its importance has not yet been fully appreciated within the field of ethics. Hence, the purpose of this paper is to study uncertainty in technology development and its consequences for ethics. Going on the insight of other scientific disciplines su
37#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 22:07:48 | 只看該作者
New Technologies, Common Sense and the Paradoxical Precautionary Principlef the PP may be suitable, but are not importantly different from Cost-Benefit Analysis (CBA). Strong versions of the PP are importantly distinct from CBA but are not a suitable basis for regulation because they lead to paradoxical outcomes if applied consistently. I consider three different lines of
38#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-28 03:22:20 | 只看該作者
Complex Technology, Complex Calculations: Uses and Abuses of Precautionary Reasoning in Lawscue the precautionary principle as such. However, it is argued, using Pascal’s Wager, that there are conditions under which precautionary reasoning is valid, which provides a general principle for the limiting case. Although the limiting principle does not apply straightforwardly to the principle t
39#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-28 06:44:28 | 只看該作者
40#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-28 13:54:02 | 只看該作者
978-90-481-8477-4Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛(ài)論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點(diǎn)評(píng) 投稿經(jīng)驗(yàn)總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機(jī)版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國(guó)際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-16 06:05
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
宜川县| 潞西市| 崇礼县| 兴文县| 宝应县| 道孚县| 于田县| 承德县| 娄底市| 濮阳市| 长子县| 东兰县| 灵璧县| 余庆县| 杭锦后旗| 双流县| 黑龙江省| 稷山县| 宁国市| 弥勒县| 东丽区| 柳江县| 潼关县| 上杭县| 若尔盖县| 广德县| 蒙阴县| 金湖县| 雅江县| 绿春县| 科尔| 霍州市| 同江市| 义马市| 湘潭县| 井研县| 麟游县| 嘉峪关市| 通化县| 祁阳县| 成武县|