找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開(kāi)始

掃一掃,訪問(wèn)微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Evaluating New Technologies; Methodological Probl Paul Sollie,Marcus Düwell Book 2009 Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009 Ethical Tec

[復(fù)制鏈接]
樓主: 我贊成
31#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 21:00:25 | 只看該作者
32#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 05:03:38 | 只看該作者
The Moral Relevance of Technological Artifactsnt, and it analyzes the ethical dimensions of technology itself. First, the chapter addresses the question of how to conceptualize and assess the moral significance of technological artifacts. If technologies help to shape moral actions and decisions, how to understand and evaluate this moral role o
33#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 05:53:52 | 只看該作者
Interdisciplinarity, Applied Ethics and Social Scienceicists working together, but also by an increasing attention, from both sides, to the very nature of their cooperation. The debate on this topic has been ongoing for more than twenty years, but in the last years the discussion became more intense. However, one can doubt whether up until now the rele
34#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 09:36:40 | 只看該作者
35#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 17:25:09 | 只看該作者
36#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 21:48:14 | 只看該作者
On Uncertainty in Ethics and Technologyinty is a pivotal feature of complex technologies, its importance has not yet been fully appreciated within the field of ethics. Hence, the purpose of this paper is to study uncertainty in technology development and its consequences for ethics. Going on the insight of other scientific disciplines su
37#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 22:07:48 | 只看該作者
New Technologies, Common Sense and the Paradoxical Precautionary Principlef the PP may be suitable, but are not importantly different from Cost-Benefit Analysis (CBA). Strong versions of the PP are importantly distinct from CBA but are not a suitable basis for regulation because they lead to paradoxical outcomes if applied consistently. I consider three different lines of
38#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-28 03:22:20 | 只看該作者
Complex Technology, Complex Calculations: Uses and Abuses of Precautionary Reasoning in Lawscue the precautionary principle as such. However, it is argued, using Pascal’s Wager, that there are conditions under which precautionary reasoning is valid, which provides a general principle for the limiting case. Although the limiting principle does not apply straightforwardly to the principle t
39#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-28 06:44:28 | 只看該作者
40#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-28 13:54:02 | 只看該作者
978-90-481-8477-4Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛(ài)論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點(diǎn)評(píng) 投稿經(jīng)驗(yàn)總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機(jī)版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國(guó)際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-16 08:42
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
青岛市| 贞丰县| 永定县| 锦州市| 喜德县| 开江县| 城固县| 宣威市| 舟曲县| 太仆寺旗| 洪泽县| 南通市| 英山县| 永仁县| 日喀则市| 红原县| 山东省| 璧山县| 洛隆县| 南川市| 兴化市| 苏州市| 舟曲县| 休宁县| 万山特区| 陇川县| 高邑县| 封开县| 台南县| 北海市| 积石山| 响水县| 应城市| 林甸县| 咸阳市| 宜兰市| 福安市| 潍坊市| 嘉义县| 当阳市| 防城港市|