Titlebook: European Parliament Ascendant; Parliamentary Strate Adrienne Héritier,Katharina L. Meissner,Magnus G. Book 2019 The Editor(s) (if applicab

性冷淡

ureter

Override

Methodology and Case Selectiontracing. Further, it specifies our methods of data collection. Moreover, we explain the book’s case selection rationale covering the EP’s institutional empowerment (or lack of it) over time and across policies. Hence, in order to corroborate or falsify our propositions, . includes positive cases of

山間窄路

休息

The European Parliament in the Nomination and Investiture of the Commissionthe outset of European integration to a quasi-election of the Commission President using the . procedure in 2014. This chapter provides evidence that the EP has been using a multitude of strategies to increase its rights in this area. Notably, the EP very successfully applied the strategies of unila

自由職業(yè)者

The European Parliament in the Budgetary Processincreased significantly since the creation of the European Economic Community. However, this empowerment has been mostly informal and irregular: treaty provisions kept intact for more than thirty years, and even today the EP has no say in revenues. Covering positive and negative cases in the budgeta

oxidant

The European Parliament in Economic Governancetricts the EP’s right to co-legislation in economic governance primarily to the area of multilateral surveillance. The entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty, however, coincided with the onset of the Eurozone crisis. Hence, we examine the extent to which the EP has been able to increase its own power

使糾纏

Vasoconstrictor

Conclusion: European Parliament Ascendant?d considerable success in expanding its formal and informal powers by using its strategies skilfully. Furthermore, we systematically compare which strategies the EP used to widen its powers; how this varies between cases; and what accounts for this variation. Moreover, we explain why we observe vari

偏見