Titlebook: European Integration and the Problem of the State; A Critique of the Bo Stefan Borg Book 2015 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan P

松軟無力

種屬關(guān)系

homocysteine

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-0407-0hey seem to inspire less enthusiasm than perhaps at any previous time in postwar European history. The introduction answered that question in rather general terms by arguing that deconstructive textual analysis is ultimately concerned with ethics. Thus, I have in the preceding chapters pointed to so

Canyon

手段

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-0407-0liness of the ideas put forward in this book; the first point has to do with the increasing diversity on the European continent, and the second point concerns the rapid militarization of the EU. The second section of the chapter concludes the book by summarizing its main argument.

溫和女孩

澄清

鐵塔等

embolus

On the Limited Imagination of Neofunctionalism, in EIS: i.e., the explanatory, or predictive, power that neofunctionalism may or may not hold in accounting for the trajectory of European integration conceived of as a chain of historical events. Rather, I am interested in the question of what kind of ‘Europe’ neo-functionalist discourse seeks to

modifier

Political Theory Meets European Integration Studies,e EU’s competences were extended and the EU moved from intergovernmental to supranational modes of decisionmaking in a number of policy areas, ‘Euroskepticism’ was seemingly on the rise across virtually all of its member states. The so-called ‘permissive consensus,’ i.e. the utilitarian belief that