找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開(kāi)始

掃一掃,訪問(wèn)微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: European Constitutional Courts towards Data Retention Laws; Marek Zubik,Jan Podkowik,Robert Rybski Book 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland A

[復(fù)制鏈接]
41#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-28 14:39:20 | 只看該作者
Data Retention in Polandstic law on covert electronic surveillance with the Constitution and the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms. The case was heard after seven joint motions were filed in 2011 and 2012 by the Human Rights Defender (Ombudsman) and the Attorney General. The Tribunal di
42#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-28 22:19:23 | 只看該作者
Data Retention in Portugaln this topic. It begins with a review of the Portuguese constitutional framework on the right to privacy, then the inviolability of communications and the protection of automated data is discussed, and the Portuguese system of constitutional review and the implementation of the?law are briefly analy
43#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-29 01:19:02 | 只看該作者
Data Retention in RomaniaStates of the European Union, Romania had to also transpose Directive 2006/24/EC, but the law was shortly repealed. Thus, the Romanian Constitutional Court is among the first courts in Europe that declared the national legal provisions on data retention as contrary to the Constitution. Furthermore,
44#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-29 04:44:46 | 只看該作者
45#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-29 07:49:00 | 只看該作者
46#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-29 12:05:27 | 只看該作者
Judicial Dialogue on Data Retention Laws?in Europe in the Digital Age: Concluding Remarkst presents an outline of judicial dialogue in this matter. In addition, the constitutional standard concerning both the data retention mechanism itself and the premises for providing access to retained data are indicated.
47#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-29 17:08:19 | 只看該作者
Lage der arbeitenden Klasse im Jahre 1832,ge and the resulting outcome. After analysing the decision of the Constitutional Court which invalidates the Slovak implementation of the Directive, the article highlights the policy consequences for the legislator and their uptake by the Slovak Parliament.
48#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-29 20:16:46 | 只看該作者
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-47690-7t presents an outline of judicial dialogue in this matter. In addition, the constitutional standard concerning both the data retention mechanism itself and the premises for providing access to retained data are indicated.
49#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-30 02:43:09 | 只看該作者
50#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-30 08:04:28 | 只看該作者
Judicial Dialogue on Data Retention Laws?in Europe in the Digital Age: Concluding Remarkst presents an outline of judicial dialogue in this matter. In addition, the constitutional standard concerning both the data retention mechanism itself and the premises for providing access to retained data are indicated.
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛(ài)論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點(diǎn)評(píng) 投稿經(jīng)驗(yàn)總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機(jī)版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國(guó)際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-6 18:41
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
华安县| 美姑县| 苗栗县| 唐海县| 牡丹江市| 拉萨市| 胶南市| 昭平县| 涿鹿县| 敦煌市| 涟源市| 黎平县| 上犹县| 三门县| 张掖市| 宝丰县| 昌江| 甘孜县| 霍山县| 沾益县| 庆云县| 宁晋县| 嘉祥县| 鲜城| 兴山县| 巴林左旗| 息烽县| 靖江市| 廉江市| 涞源县| 沛县| 台州市| 万州区| 都安| 阜新市| 石首市| 栾川县| 沐川县| 苗栗县| 砚山县| 兴宁市|