Titlebook: Ethnic Modernism and the Making of US Literary Multiculturalism; Leif Sorensen Book 2016 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2

誓言

Incumbent

正論

浪蕩子

ineffectual

Handelsbilanz und Steuerbilanz,ertheless can gloss over earlier texts’ profound critiques of modernity in favor of a redemptive version of literary history. Using a brief reading of Ishmael Reed’s . as a case study, he elaborates an alternative theory of recovery in which the untimeliness of recovered texts is no longer a scandal

冰河期

HAUNT

Der Jungkaufmann in der Industrie.. Sorensen shows that Paredes’s scholarship presents a version of the corrido hero as a model for the kind of cultural resistance that is missing from the world of Paredes’s novel and argues that this contradiction challenges existing narratives of Chicana/o literary history and recovered versions

ADOPT

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-0348-5619-5e novel’s status as the preeminent work of native writing before 1968. In response Sorensen develops an alternative account of McNickle’s career, calling attention not only to the different political commitments that emerge from his career as an activist and scholar who helped develop Native America