Titlebook: Ethics of Digital Well-Being; A Multidisciplinary Christopher Burr,Luciano Floridi Book 2020 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(

獨(dú)行者

Book 2020es, this collection clarifies the risks and opportunities associated with deploying digital technologies in various social domains..Chapter 2 is available open access under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License via link.springer.com..

前奏曲

Erythropoietin

Allison M. Quick,Eric L. Chang,Simon S. Lod this confusion results in the subsequent conflation of corporatised identities?– poor approximations of actual digital identities, inferred and extrapolated by algorithms from individuals’ expressions of digital identity?– with digital identities proper. Finally, and to demonstrate the normative i

d-limonene

Cases in Soviet Decision Making,hus, I distinguish four different concept-types of well-being, where each type corresponds to a different moral/political purpose: (1) a rights-related concept-type, (2) a market-based concept-type, (3) an emotional-functioning concept-type, 4) an information-related concept-type.

輕浮女

流逝

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-8348-9991-0ition, interventions are often designed without any explicit ethical considerations. At present, the quality of research on embodied AI in psychiatry, psychology, and psychotherapy is varied, and there is a marked need for more robust studies, including randomized controlled trials on the benefits a

兇殘

allude

Supporting Human Autonomy in AI Systems: A Framework for Ethical Enquiry,ETUX”) that identifies six distinct spheres of technology experience. We demonstrate the value of the model for understanding human autonomy in a technology ethics context at multiple levels by applying it to the real-world case study of an AI-enhanced video recommender system. In the process we arg

格子架

Hangar