Titlebook: Ethics in Hard Times; Arthur L. Caplan (Associate for the Humanities),Da Book 1981 Springer Science+Business Media New York 1981 crisis.da

嚴(yán)重傷害

nepotism

The Concept of Moral Standing,, to sue. In current American law, infants may have standing and can sue through guardians, but neither trees nor nonhuman animals can have standing. I am, however, concerned with ethics rather than the law—although ethics may have implications for what the law should be.

chisel

涂掉

Analytic Methods and the Ethics of Policy,r too lax, teachers’ salaries far too low, or the rights of defendants far too little observed, we know what we need to know to get moving. We can worry about how much is enough when we get close, if we ever do. Meanwhile we can push on.

Pander

代替

elief might seem exceedingly odd. After all, persons in western society find themselves living in a time of unprecedented material abundance. Hunger and disease, evils all too familiar to the members of earlier generations, although far from eradicated from modern life, are plainly on the wane. Pers

NEX

obscurity

On Materialising Object-Oriented Viewsf others and more willing to sacrifice for the good of the country, instead of concentrating, as we do, on the self-interested pursuit of personal and group advantage? This is the question posed to me. In responding, I propose to begin at the beginning.

漂白

https://doi.org/10.1007/b102243r too lax, teachers’ salaries far too low, or the rights of defendants far too little observed, we know what we need to know to get moving. We can worry about how much is enough when we get close, if we ever do. Meanwhile we can push on.

經(jīng)典

Can Ethics Provide Answers?,ocial justice. Technology, which was supposed to save us, now presents as many problems as solutions—witness the controversy over nuclear energy, for example. Pessimism seems not only understandable, but rational.