Titlebook: Ethics and the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning; Lisa M. Fedoruk Book 2022 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under excl

臨時抱佛腳

Introduction to Domain Driven Data Miningnd a cognitive psychologist, we bring the humanities and social sciences into bi-directional conversations about significant socio-cultural challenges. In this chapter, we present an argument that the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (SoTL) provides a central space for nurturing interdisciplinar

喃喃而言

Method-Specific Knowledge Compilationrovisions for addressing such vulnerabilities. However, few studies capture students’ voices when it comes to issues of ethics in SoTL. This chapter explores the concept of research vulnerability by incorporating student voices about their perceptions of vulnerability in SoTL research. As a growing

旋轉(zhuǎn)一周

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7669-6 guided by principles of partnership, justice, and care. This vision is informed by focus groups we conducted with students in collaboration with a set of international colleagues; these focus groups asked students about their views of the ethical dimensions and challenges of SoTL research in the cl

蛙鳴聲

盟軍

粗鄙的人

Immobilize

Modularity for Bipartite Networks,oom experiences (including SoTL research) to ensure the university lives into its mission. This inquiry begins by exploring the purpose of ethics education: What is meant by graduating ethical students? Next, we use a three-stage model to help faculty recognize their role in ethics education. The fi

謙卑

The Course on Research Ethics (CORE): Implications for SoTL,All survey responses relating to SoTL were identified and analyzed. In this chapter, we highlight the SoTL changes within the TCPS 2 documents. This chapter also provides a lens into SoTL researchers’ perspectives on Research Ethics Boards, their knowledge and awareness of research ethics, and the a

Fresco

供過于求

Wrestling the Monster: Novice SoTL Researchers, Ethics, and the Dual Role,archer can often feel confusing and confounding, and navigating the ethical implications of this can create a sense of liminality. This chapter offers an alternative hermeneutic reading of the ethical review process as a metaphorical monster that arises in ., helping us recast familiar categories in