找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Ethics and Taxation; Robert F. van Brederode Book 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020 taxation.ethics.law and morality.tax fraud.

[復(fù)制鏈接]
樓主: Autopsy
41#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-28 14:43:59 | 只看該作者
Head, Proportional, or Progressive Taxation: An Evaluation Based on Jewish and Christian Ethicstion, I examine the presence of each of these taxing options in Jewish and Christian thinking. Beginning with the Hebrew Bible this examination proceeds to the texts and practices of classical (Talmudic) Judaism, the Christian New Testament, and the later Jewish, Roman Catholic, and Protestant teach
42#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-28 19:22:09 | 只看該作者
Developing Moral Standards for Taxationon of a nation’s philosophical ideals of distributive justice. As such, legislators must consider the underlying philosophical beliefs of their constituents in determining the tax laws. Those philosophical beliefs should then inform decisions regarding the form those taxes should take, and amount of
43#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-29 02:11:21 | 只看該作者
Global Tax Justice: Who’s Involved?actors, including NGO’s, are not somehow involved in the decision-making processes of these institutions. It researches this question with the help of an analysis of the prescriptive legitimacy of international institutions in two competing models of global tax governance: the intergovernmental mode
44#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-29 04:35:35 | 只看該作者
Taxpayers’ Subjective Concepts of Taxes, Tax Evasion, and Tax Avoidanceconceptualizations and evaluations are often not objective or true, but they determine how citizens construct their subjective reality. Attitudes, judgments, and behavior intentions eventually shape people’s behavior which is often more affected by what they think than by what actually is. We first
45#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-29 07:23:21 | 只看該作者
46#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-29 12:58:41 | 只看該作者
Ethical Standards for Tax Advisersf the reasons for this emphasis and some of the administrative responses to the involvement of advisers in less acceptable forms of tax planning. The chapter notes signs of a divergence (without concluding that there has been complete separation) of ethics between tax advisers in the legal professio
47#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-29 19:37:41 | 只看該作者
48#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-29 22:09:01 | 只看該作者
Is There Any International Fundamental Right Against an International General Anti-avoidance Rule?rnational taxation. It analyses whether or not an international GAAR, such as the PPT (principal purpose test) of the OECD Multilateral Instrument may be against some international fundamental rights under International Conventions on Human Rights. It also argues what type of GAAR or specific rules
49#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-30 00:40:29 | 只看該作者
Countermeasures to Tax Fraud, Evasion and Avoidance: A Critical Reviewsed to coerce compliance with tax laws: creating third-party liability for lost VAT; the abuse of law doctrine as developed by the Court of Justice of the European Union; blacklisting of tax havens; public shaming of tax avoiders; and imposing mandatory, third-party, cross-border reporting. The resu
50#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-30 04:19:00 | 只看該作者
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點(diǎn)評(píng) 投稿經(jīng)驗(yàn)總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機(jī)版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國(guó)際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-23 02:13
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
任丘市| 东乡族自治县| 柳林县| 巴林右旗| 拜泉县| 土默特左旗| 遂平县| 佛学| 福海县| 明水县| 和平区| 嘉义县| 类乌齐县| 潢川县| 纳雍县| 浪卡子县| 和政县| 东兰县| 苍梧县| 金门县| 东港市| 广元市| 华安县| 虞城县| 镇远县| 东山县| 通海县| 兴隆县| 神农架林区| 南阳市| 轮台县| 太和县| 射洪县| 潞西市| 凤城市| 道真| 泽州县| 子洲县| 嘉荫县| 红安县| 九龙坡区|