Titlebook: Ethics and Philosophical Critique in William James; Sarin Marchetti Book 2015 Sarin Marchetti 2015 Ethics.Metaphilosophy.Pragmatism.Willia

僵局

書目名稱Ethics and Philosophical Critique in William James影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Ethics and Philosophical Critique in William James影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Ethics and Philosophical Critique in William James網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Ethics and Philosophical Critique in William James網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Ethics and Philosophical Critique in William James被引頻次




書目名稱Ethics and Philosophical Critique in William James被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Ethics and Philosophical Critique in William James年度引用




書目名稱Ethics and Philosophical Critique in William James年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Ethics and Philosophical Critique in William James讀者反饋




書目名稱Ethics and Philosophical Critique in William James讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

CARE

新星

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-663-20189-2 be one. Yet pluralism should not be mistaken for intellectual laxity, as one’s selective take on reality or interested approach to an author can and should be defended with as many reasons and arguments as one is capable of, and then left to others to be challenged and eventually transformed in an

ODIUM

acclimate

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41669-9losopher. In his most famous and celebrated ethical essay, “Moral Philosopher,” James employs the exhortative register to feature his therapeutic and transformational understanding of philosophical reflection. It is thus quite surprising that this register has gone virtually unnoticed by the literat

含鐵

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-66971-6 This brings us to consider what kind of relationship runs between such writings. Most commentators depict this relationship in foundational terms: “Moral Philosopher” would contain James’s moral theory that he then applied, more or less successfully and consistently, to the resolutions of various e

含鐵

P. Neyret,D. Dejour,D. Ait Si Selmi of the views stated there for the discourse of the nature and stakes of moral reflection as approached in other texts. This has to do both with the inner complexity of James’s work on truth, and with an entrenched interpretation which has been mostly deaf to the ethical stakes of such texts. In P,

艱苦地移動

gustation

Book 2015Marchetti offers a revisionist account of James‘s contribution to moral thought in the light of his pragmatic conception of philosophical activity. He sketches a composite picture of a Jamesian approach to ethics revolving around the key notion and practice of a therapeutic critique of one‘s ordinary moral convictions and style of moral reasoning.

虛度

https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137541789Ethics; Metaphilosophy; Pragmatism; William James; ethics; moral philosophy; morality; philosophy; pragmatis