Titlebook: Ethics and Archaeological Praxis; Cristóbal Gnecco,Dorothy Lippert Book 2015 Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015 archaeological

盲信者

Book 2015 This powerful new ethics—its newness is based, to a large extent, in that it is the first time that archaeological ethics is explicitly stated, as if it didn’t exist before—emanates from metropolitan centers, only to be adopted elsewhere. In this regard, it is worth probing the very nature of the d

禮節(jié)

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-663-07685-8owledge and a desire to relate to the past in a way that enhances their present. We suggest several mechanisms to overcome some of the legislative handicaps to such aspirations and continue the path towards truly equal partnerships and an ethical approach of narrating the past in the present.

犬儒主義者

convulsion

Islam , Kommunikation untersuchend to archaeology. Are we responsible for that? Looking at the growth of archaeology in developing countries might answer this question. The imposition of a value for the past/heritage from an occidental point of view has created a tourism-related market, supported by International Organizations that

Ejaculate

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-663-04550-2 “experts” and self-defined stewards of cultural property over other epistemic groups that may lay claim to it. The second is termed “multicultural ethics,” which posits a distinctively explicit openness (if only superficially) to incorporating alternative or “minority” voices in acts of designating

思想

蛛絲

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-1646-7archaeological practice and ethics; capitalism and archaeology; community archaeology; ethical principl

傳授知識(shí)

彎腰

Ethical Archaeologies: The Politics of Social Justicehttp://image.papertrans.cn/e/image/315979.jpg

思考才皺眉