找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Ethical Reasoning in Big Data; An Exploratory Analy Jeff Collmann,Sorin Adam Matei Book 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

[復制鏈接]
查看: 49026|回復: 43
樓主
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 18:36:07 | 只看該作者 |倒序瀏覽 |閱讀模式
書目名稱Ethical Reasoning in Big Data
副標題An Exploratory Analy
編輯Jeff Collmann,Sorin Adam Matei
視頻videohttp://file.papertrans.cn/316/315929/315929.mp4
概述Defines and explains the main types of ethical dilemmas in handling big data.Proposes a set of principles for developing sound ethical handling of big data.Discusses methods for individual and organiz
叢書名稱Computational Social Sciences
圖書封面Titlebook: Ethical Reasoning in Big Data; An Exploratory Analy Jeff Collmann,Sorin Adam Matei Book 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
描述This book springs from a multidisciplinary, multi-organizational, and multi-sector conversation about the privacy and ethical implications of research in human affairs using big data. The need to cultivate and enlist the public’s trust in the abilities of particular scientists and scientific institutions constitutes one of this book’s major themes. The advent of the Internet, the mass digitization of research information, and social media brought about, among many other things, the ability to harvest – sometimes implicitly – a wealth of human genomic, biological, behavioral, economic, political, and social data for the purposes of scientific research as well as commerce, government affairs, and social interaction. What type of ethical dilemmas did such changes generate? How should scientists collect, manipulate, and disseminate this information? The effects of this revolution and its ethical implications are wide-ranging. This book includes the opinions of myriad investigators, practitioners, and stakeholders in big data on human beings who also routinely reflect on the privacy and ethical issues of this phenomenon. Dedicated to the practice of ethical reasoning and reflection in a
出版日期Book 2016
關鍵詞Big data abuse; Big data education; Big data ethics; Commercialization of big data; Ethics and genomic r
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28422-4
isbn_softcover978-3-319-80351-7
isbn_ebook978-3-319-28422-4Series ISSN 2509-9574 Series E-ISSN 2509-9582
issn_series 2509-9574
copyrightSpringer International Publishing Switzerland 2016
The information of publication is updating

書目名稱Ethical Reasoning in Big Data影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Ethical Reasoning in Big Data影響因子(影響力)學科排名




書目名稱Ethical Reasoning in Big Data網絡公開度




書目名稱Ethical Reasoning in Big Data網絡公開度學科排名




書目名稱Ethical Reasoning in Big Data被引頻次




書目名稱Ethical Reasoning in Big Data被引頻次學科排名




書目名稱Ethical Reasoning in Big Data年度引用




書目名稱Ethical Reasoning in Big Data年度引用學科排名




書目名稱Ethical Reasoning in Big Data讀者反饋




書目名稱Ethical Reasoning in Big Data讀者反饋學科排名




單選投票, 共有 0 人參與投票
 

0票 0%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用戶組沒有投票權限
沙發(fā)
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 20:33:33 | 只看該作者
板凳
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 03:58:56 | 只看該作者
,Schnittgeschwindigkeiten und Vorschübe,e raised questions about the privacy implications of LSGRs, given that all genomic data is theoretically re-identifiable. Privacy can be further threatened by the possibility of aggregation of data sets, which can give rise to unexpected, and potentially sensitive, information. Beyond privacy concer
地板
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 07:42:57 | 只看該作者
5#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 09:56:29 | 只看該作者
6#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 13:54:01 | 只看該作者
,Einzelerzeugnisse der Hüttenwerke,e new material. Similarly, teaching and learning about ethics, or professional practice, is qualitatively different— particularly in terms of assessment—than it is around statistics and biostatistics/data analysis. A second barrier is .: it can sometimes seem that “ethics training” is only required
7#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 19:08:38 | 只看該作者
,Das pathologische Liquoreiwei?bild,tion. The decision tree also encourages investigators to reflect on the range of ethical implications of their research, including potential benefits and harms as well as implications for individual and group autonomy, social justice and trust in the institution of science. We offer the DMP decision
8#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 00:55:52 | 只看該作者
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-36649-3: (1) disciplines and fields are dynamic, and . stewardship; (2) the quality and integrity of disciplines must be actively preserved and conserved; and (3) there are particular habits of mind that characterize “those to whom we can entrust” the core features of a discipline or field. In order to for
9#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 03:43:03 | 只看該作者
10#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 09:06:25 | 只看該作者
 關于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務流程 影響因子官網 吾愛論文網 大講堂 北京大學 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點評 投稿經驗總結 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國際 ( 京公網安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-22 07:01
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網安備110108008328 版權所有 All rights reserved
快速回復 返回頂部 返回列表
建湖县| 张掖市| 乐陵市| 廊坊市| 岳阳县| 噶尔县| 义乌市| 孝昌县| 建阳市| 信宜市| 铜川市| 新源县| 泉州市| 砀山县| 古交市| 夏河县| 岳阳县| 甘孜| 榆林市| 揭阳市| 洛南县| 全椒县| 泉州市| 南部县| 富阳市| 马鞍山市| 额敏县| 霍林郭勒市| 卢龙县| 县级市| 达州市| 治多县| 新晃| 盈江县| 五指山市| 金川县| 壶关县| 奎屯市| 安康市| 凤台县| 台北市|