Titlebook: Ethical Exploration in a Multifaith Society; Catherine Shelley Book 2017 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2017 christianity

Glitch

書目名稱Ethical Exploration in a Multifaith Society影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Ethical Exploration in a Multifaith Society影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Ethical Exploration in a Multifaith Society網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Ethical Exploration in a Multifaith Society網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Ethical Exploration in a Multifaith Society被引頻次




書目名稱Ethical Exploration in a Multifaith Society被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Ethical Exploration in a Multifaith Society年度引用




書目名稱Ethical Exploration in a Multifaith Society年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Ethical Exploration in a Multifaith Society讀者反饋




書目名稱Ethical Exploration in a Multifaith Society讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

guardianship

Reason and Its History in Ethics and Theology,imeline will trace overlapping influences, particularly the impact of Greek ethical thought on the Abrahamic faiths. Arguments from history by Alistair McIntyre will be evaluated along with case studies and methodologies explored by writers such as Tariq Ramadan, Jonathan Sacks and David Novak. The

arthrodesis

Natural Law, Reason and Religion,atural law and virtue ethics?– all of which have their purely secular as well as their theological interpretations. The role of nature in the . faiths will also be considered and compared with western and Abrahamic approaches. The development of ideas about virtue ethics from natural law paradigms a

florid

Outmoded

誹謗

Authority and Religious Texts,tions. However, the interpretation, role and force of scripture varies not only between but within traditions. For example, Scriptural sources of revelation are foundational to Judaism, Christianity and Islam but although important, carry a different weight within other faith traditions. Yet even wi

誹謗

delegate

Prophylaxis

Fraudulent

Concluding Thoughts, Looking Forward,losophical paradigms. The summary will also identify those areas in which differences remain between the two domains or methodologies. The differences will be assessed by reference to what diversity can be lived with and those areas in which bridging of the gaps is needed. By way of conclusion propo